vinyarb

like, what is legit anymore?

B Clint killed his DNC speech

Sep
07

Obama2012

 

If you haven’t seen Bill Clinton’s DNC speech. Watch it now.

And tell me why you shouldn’t bring back Obama for 4 more years.

 

 

Musings Comments Off on B Clint killed his DNC speech

VHEMT – Voluntary Human Extinction Movement

Sep
06

earth

In doing some casual research for my as yet titled and written novel, I came upon a most interesting movement called the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEMT – pronounced vehement).

Now, it is no surprise that humankind has been instrumental in creating a lot of the problems we face today: extinction of certain animal species due to rapid urbanization or over-hunting, massive overuse of natural resources resulting in a change in Earth’s biosphere and its ability to repair itself, and a myriad of other activities causing climate change.

As our global population increases, so does our reliance on planetary resources. Everyday we are mining the world for resources. Resources that are finite. And depleting fast.

We have seen calls to explore a more sustainable approach in our daily lives, such as using renewable energy sources, and cutting down of unnecessary use of power. Every year, we observe Earth Hour by turning off our lights and power, and “celebrate” the sacrifice we’re making for Earth.

That’s 1 hour out of 8,765.81 hours in a year. What real difference does it make, if any? Sure, the concerts and ads drive awareness. But its a big leap from awareness to action.

VHEMT believes that the problems Earth is facing, is an overpopulation of destructive humans. And they believe that the only solution would be a gradual voluntary extinction of the human race by abstaining from reproduction.

Negative Population Growth, another organisation that’s advocating a gradual reduction of human population believes that an optimal world population stands at between 2 to 3 billion people. We are now at 7.

Q&A with Les U. Knight

Interested to know more, I reached out to Les U. Knight, founder of VHEMT for more insight via email. Below is the email exchange we had:

Qn 1) VHEMT started in 1991. Given the technological advancements over the years, and given Martian Rover Curiosity’s successful landing and a possible future scenario of inter-planetary human existence, does this change your beliefs somewhat, or has it strengthened your resolve to promote VHEMT’s beliefs? (One can argue that we can conceivably spread out the population over planets and maintain a healthy eco-system)

The first issue of These EXIT Times was published in 1991, beginning the spread of the VHEMT concept of not breeding until we’re extinct. I had arrived at this conclusion 20 years earlier, and I often hear from people around the planet who have independently done so as well. So, although the name was only attached to the philosophy in the late 1980s, the idea of a planet without humans dates back into antiquity.

The answer to the second part of your question may be found at: http://vhemt.org/scififantasy.htm#colonize

2) Having to push this concept of voluntary extinction over 20 odd years, would you say that the movement, or the concept in people, has in general grown? In other words, do you think you’re winning?

Each day, 367,400 potential VHEMT Volunteers are born, but The Movement isn’t increasing by that many so I have to admit we’re losing ground. However, the meme has spread and insinuated itself into many bodies of work. Awareness sometimes sweeps societies rapidly, shifting the paradigm radically. Communication has never been as easy as it is today, enabling new ideas a chance for acceptance or rejection in a greatly compressed time frame. Denial blocks consideration of conflicting ideas, impeding awareness growth.

3) At this point in time, with the global issues facing us, do you think Earth’s problems are still reversible, or have we gone past the point of any hope of helping Earth restore its resources?

This is a question every couple should ask themselves before creating a new human which will live in the future we are engineering. There are actually three questions. First, if we continue as we are, how likely is it that human existence will be adequately supported throughout their lifetime? Second, how likely is it that humanity will collectively make the changes needed to ensure that support? Finally, what odds of success would you require before gambling on a yet-to-be-conceived loved one’s future? If the first two are low and that last high, the choice should be obvious.

Species we’ve driven to extinction have certainly passed the point of no return, as have many ecosystems. Our overshoot of Earth’s carrying capacity is accelerating while that capacity is diminishing, primarily due to our redundant breeding. Human civilizations have always collapsed rather than stopping at a sustainable size, and this time it’s global. At this point, it’s a question of which will collapse first, civilization or Earth’s biosphere.

If our precarious global civilization collapses first, the biosphere will recover somewhat over thousands of years, while we rebuild on the ruins and have another try at the biosphere. If Earth’s biosphere collapses, our species, along with millions of others, will no longer exist.

Both of these horrific futures could be avoided if we would stop creating more ourselves and start undoing what we’ve done. A peaceful and bountiful world for all humanity could be achieved as we phase ourselves out. The chances of this happening are slim to none, which is all the more reason to avoid sentencing another of us to life.

4) If, in our lifetimes, we’re miraculously able to terraform Mars (or even the moon), and you’re given the opportunity to be among its first residents, would you?

No. Mental health is a challenge to maintain in those conditions. My modest backyard provides more pleasure than anything that could be created off planet.

What do you think of VHEMT’s ideals and philosophies? Do you think they are too extreme?

Either way, we have to admit, we’re seriously screwing with the Earth’s biosphere as it is, and something drastic has to be done, or we may be facing extinction as a species (or worse, as a planet) sooner than we think.

I’m a believer in course-correction. If we don’t take steps to return Earth to a level where we can all co-exist in a mutually beneficial way, Earth will take steps to return to that state. And I think we wouldn’t like Her way.

Still, not breeding us to extinction seems pretty impossible, as there’s just no way every human will approve of this concept. But cost of living may help a bit.

Right now, many developed nations are facing this issue (Singapore as well) of not replacing us fast enough. Isn’t that in a way what VHEMT wants as well? If the world governments were to set a decree that every couple sticks to having only 1 child (and over time, decreasing the world population), will it help solve the issue of overpopulation? (again a case of easier said than done)

Maybe it will, and hopefully, not too late to save the world.

Quick thought: If we do manage to inhabit and terra-form other planets, leaving Earth to die after ravishing it of resources, will we not become the monsters of our imaginations? Do we dare say “we come in peace” as we land on a new planet, ready to devour its resources?

Special thanks to Les, who replied my email very promptly. Check out VHEMT’s official site for more information on their ideals and beliefs.

Interesting read: The impact humans have on the world

Musings, Sustainability Comments Off on VHEMT – Voluntary Human Extinction Movement

Behind every successful man is a supportive chair

Aug
31

Well? Don't just stand there...

One of the biggest buzz to come out of the Republican National Convention has got to be the stunt Clint Eastwood pulled. He spoke directly to a chair. That was empty.

Hard questions were asked, and understandably, the chair was cowered into silence.

So points for silencing a chair, unlike Ben Linus, who couldn’t handle his chair.

 

This quickly prompted the man himself, Barack Obama, to reassure the world that he is in complete control of HIS chair.

Musings Comments Off on Behind every successful man is a supportive chair

Welcome to Singaaahhh oooh… right there..

Aug
31

So, a pair of Japanese pornstars posed as tourists to make a porno in Singapore. Part 2 in a potentially groundbreaking franchise (apparently part 1 in Cambodia), they proceed to explore some of our sights and landmarks of Singapore, before starting to erm… stress test the beds at Marina Bay Sands.

According to a news report in Insing, Aoki Misora (and the man) first helped themselves to some local delights like Chicken Rice (Maxwell market!) and Laksa. They also visited Chinatown, Boat Quay, rode on a tri-shaw and had a dip in the Infinity pool at MBS.

All in, I’d say they had a pretty good time!

Wonder if we’ll see an influx of Japanese tourists in Singapore next year.

What do you think of the idea of seeing major Singapore landmarks in a porno?

Musings Comments Off on Welcome to Singaaahhh oooh… right there..

Me at the Zoo – first youtube video posted

Aug
24

This is ‘Me at the Zoo’, the first video to be posted on youtube.

This was posted by Jawed Karim, one of the co-founders of Youtube, on April 23, 2005.

Running at only 19 seconds long, it marked the start of a long journey into changing how we view our videos today. And in that 7 years, this video has been viewed 8,733,512 times.

It even has its own wiki entry. And like I always say, if its on Wiki, its important.

Amazing, Musings Comments Off on Me at the Zoo – first youtube video posted

Social Media: Its a hard knock life

Aug
14

So there you are, social media evangelist for Starhub. You found something cool, like keyboard teacups, and decide to share it with your fans as part of an engagement post.

And truth be told, the cups really are cool and cute and geeky. No way this is going to get any negative feedback.

starhub social media

Bam! Trolled.

 

Social media… its a hard knock life.

 

Enormous problems if Singapore don’t procreate

Aug
13

So says former MM Lee Kuan Yew.

Just to get this out of the way, i’m not ranting (much), and let’s get the petty squabbles of the “if I earn as much as you, i’ll have 10 kids” argument. I’m simply stating my point of view, my predicament, and why married couples in their approaching-mid-30s stage are hesitant to have a child.

(Disclaimer: I am currently trying for a kid. So my lack of kid is not for a lack of trying.)

My wife and I are firmly entrenched in the sandwich class. Not too poor to live hand-to-mouth, but certainly not too rich to indulge in goat’s milk baths. We indulge in movies, have the occasional nice meal on anniversaries, and take the public transport. Your average worker bee.

We live in our own 5-room HDB (which we’ll be paying for till 2038), and while we would like to own a car so travelling is easier (especially when you have a kid and have tons of kid-things in tow), we also think its crazy to lay 90,000 good money for a piece of paper that says you may now proceed to buy a car.

While Singapore Inc strives to achieve greater and higher economic success year on year, so have our employers’ expectations of us. Outwardly, while they smile and say “hey, take all the maternity leave you want”, we all know they’re secretly interviewing 2 or 3 foreign imports (talent, I think, is too strong a word for them) who are willing to do more for less (because “currencies” and “its only for a couple of years”).

So, we need to be more efficient and productive at work whilst looking over our shoulders in fear of losing out to cheaper alternatives, generally work longer hours, and yet, when we get home, still need to get in the mood for baby-making? Truth be told, I get a shiver of dread, and I swear I can feel an incremental turn of the vice on my migraine each time my work-blackberry vibrates.

We’re already lamenting a lack of time spent as husband and wife. When a kid comes along, that’s just going to morph into fathering and mothering duty time.

Don’t get me wrong. I do want to have a kid (2 is simply too expensive), I’m just saying its too easy to see why people wouldn’t.

Elaine Ee makes some very good points in her article. She points out a few key aspects that needs to be changed. Better work-life balance, a more affordable everything, and a collective change in the government’s policy of running a nation like a corporation.

She says:

“What we need now is the political will to make some of these changes – at a deep, cultural level. Not a lecture on how people need to change their attitudes towards marriage and parenthood, and have babies to serve their nation—because no one on earth will have a baby for that reason.

So, he says we’ll have enormous problems if we don’t pro-create. I say we have some garnishing to prepare before we even try to fry that fish.

Musings Comments Off on Enormous problems if Singapore don’t procreate

It pays to do your triple somersaults really well

Aug
10
Yang Hak Seon gold medallist

If I melt this, i can feed my family for 2 months!

Nobody’s heard of South Korean gymnast Yang Hak-Seon. Until he struck gold on monday, and took home South Korea’s first ever Olympic Gold in gymnastics.

He’d also been living in a makeshift structure made out of thin wooden boards and plastic sheeting in a small polytunnel in a rural province.

Well, since that story broke, several corporations have come forward to provide for Yang, so that he wouldn’t have to worry about finances and family, and can concentrate on his sport. (Which are really nice gestures). Among them are LG, who donated 500million won (USD444,000), Samla Group, a construction company who offered to build him a home, and Nongshim, an instant noodle manufacturer, who’s promised him a limitless supply of instant noodles (seriously, the dude’s now got USD444,000. You think his favourite food is still gonna be instant noodles? Okay… but still, a nice gesture).

 

Wait! Here’s an idea! Singapore, buy him lah! Afterall, you don’t only want to win in table-tennis, do you? Besides, we’ve already got the perfect place to house him!

 

Musings Comments Off on It pays to do your triple somersaults really well